Yes, and here is the record. A bankruptcy case naming Tednologies, Inc. is on the docket of the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Alaska, under Chapter 7, filed 26 August 2025.
| Company | Tednologies, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Case number | 25-00143 |
| Court | District of Alaska (AK) |
| Chapter | 7 — liquidation |
| Petition filed | 26 August 2025 |
| 90-day preference window | 28 May 2025 to 26 August 2025 |
| Activity we recorded | None. We hold the case record, not its docket entries. |
The business stops operating. A trustee is appointed to sell whatever assets exist and distribute the proceeds in an order set by statute.
If you are owed money. Secured creditors and priority claims are paid first. Unsecured trade creditors sit near the back of that queue, and in many chapter 7 business cases there is nothing left by the time the queue reaches them.
If you were paid by Tednologies, Inc. recently, read this before you spend it. A trustee can sue to take back money the company paid you in the 90 days before it filed. The statute reaches any transfer made "on or within 90 days before the date of the filing of the petition" (11 U.S.C. 547(b)(4)(A)).
The dates, for this case. The petition was filed on 26 August 2025, so the 90-day window runs from 28 May 2025 to 26 August 2025. Money Tednologies, Inc. paid you inside those dates is what a preference claim would be about. If you were an insider of Tednologies, Inc., and an ordinary supplier is not, the reach-back starts a year earlier on 26 August 2024 (11 U.S.C. 547(b)(4)(B), 11 U.S.C. 101(31)(B)).
Inside that window the law starts from the assumption the company was broke. 11 U.S.C. 547(f) says the debtor "is presumed to have been insolvent" during those 90 days, so nobody has to prove it was insolvent when your payment cleared. That is a presumption applied inside a preference action, and it is not a ruling that the company was insolvent for any other purpose.
There are real defences and suppliers win on them. The common one is that the debt and the payment were both ordinary course between you and this customer, or the payment was made on ordinary business terms (11 U.S.C. 547(c)(2)). Others cover getting paid at the same time you delivered (11 U.S.C. 547(c)(1)) and shipping more goods after the payment (11 U.S.C. 547(c)(4)). Since 2019 the trustee also has to act "based on reasonable due diligence" and take account of defences they know or could reasonably know about (11 U.S.C. 547(b)).
There is a small-dollar floor, and for this case it is $8,575. In a case where the debts are not primarily consumer debts, a transfer whose aggregate value is below that cannot be avoided under this section (11 U.S.C. 547(c)(9)). The figure printed inside the statute is the un-adjusted $5,000; $8,575 is the amount in force for a case commenced on or after 1 April 2025 (90 Fed. Reg. 8941 (Feb. 4, 2025), effective April 1, 2025; adjustment authority 11 U.S.C. 104(a)). It applies to this case because 11 U.S.C. 104(c) ties the amount to the date the case was commenced rather than to today.
Demand letters on preference claims go out routinely and often get reduced or dropped. The useful response to one is your payment history and a bankruptcy lawyer. Nothing here is legal advice and none of it is a prediction about your situation.
The rule is 70 days after the order for relief in a voluntary chapter 7 case (Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002(c)). In a voluntary case the order for relief is the petition, which for this case was 26 August 2025.
We do not print the resulting date, because four things we cannot see could move it, and two of them move it EARLIER.
The notice the court mails you carries the controlling date. Use it, and do not compute one from this page. A no-asset chapter 7 that later finds assets also triggers a fresh notice with at least 90 days (Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002(c)(5)), so a case that looked closed can reopen the question. Rule 9006(a) then rolls any deadline off weekends and legal holidays, including holidays declared by the state where the district court sits, which is not knowable from a case number (Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(a)).
If a notice reached you too late to file in time, Rule 3002(c)(7) lets a creditor ask the court for up to 60 more days (Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002(c)(7)).
None, and that is a gap in our collection rather than a fact about this case. This case comes from the historical court record, which gives us the debtor, the court, the case number, the chapter and the filing date. It does not carry the individual docket entries, and this case was filed before we began watching the live feeds, so we never saw them go by.
An active case generates entries constantly. Read the absence of a list here as our silence, not the court's.
We hold more case records than docket histories, and the difference matters. Case records — who filed, which court, which chapter, what date — come from the public historical court record and reach back years. Docket entries come from the courts' live filing feeds, which carry only about 24 hours at a time, and we began archiving those on 28 July 2026.
So a case may show a full record and no entries, or three entries when the real docket has three hundred. An empty or short list of entries is a gap in our collection, never a statement that nothing happened.
For the complete and authoritative docket, use PACER or the court directly.
Everything above comes from the public federal court record: the courts' own CM/ECF filing feeds, and the CourtListener RECAP archive maintained by the Free Law Project, which is where this case record came from. The authoritative source is the court: search case 25-00143 in the District of Alaska on PACER, which is the official system and charges per page.