Yes, and here is the record. A bankruptcy case naming PSS Trucking, Inc. is on the docket of the US Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, under Chapter 11, filed 28 March 2026.
| Company | PSS Trucking, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Case number | 26-40651 |
| Court | Northern District of California (CA) |
| Chapter | 11 — reorganisation |
| Petition filed | 28 March 2026 |
| 90-day preference window | 28 December 2025 to 28 March 2026 |
| Claim deadline | set by the court, read the notice |
| Activity we recorded | None. We hold the case record, not its docket entries. |
The business generally keeps operating while it proposes a plan to restructure its debts. Management usually stays in control as a "debtor in possession".
If you are owed money. The company may keep trading and keep buying. Existing pre-filing debt is frozen and gets treated under the plan, while goods and services delivered AFTER the filing are treated differently from those delivered before.
If you were paid by PSS Trucking, Inc. recently, read this before you spend it. A trustee can sue to take back money the company paid you in the 90 days before it filed. The statute reaches any transfer made "on or within 90 days before the date of the filing of the petition" (11 U.S.C. 547(b)(4)(A)).
The dates, for this case. The petition was filed on 28 March 2026, so the 90-day window runs from 28 December 2025 to 28 March 2026. Money PSS Trucking, Inc. paid you inside those dates is what a preference claim would be about. If you were an insider of PSS Trucking, Inc., and an ordinary supplier is not, the reach-back starts a year earlier on 28 March 2025 (11 U.S.C. 547(b)(4)(B), 11 U.S.C. 101(31)(B)).
Inside that window the law starts from the assumption the company was broke. 11 U.S.C. 547(f) says the debtor "is presumed to have been insolvent" during those 90 days, so nobody has to prove it was insolvent when your payment cleared. That is a presumption applied inside a preference action, and it is not a ruling that the company was insolvent for any other purpose.
There are real defences and suppliers win on them. The common one is that the debt and the payment were both ordinary course between you and this customer, or the payment was made on ordinary business terms (11 U.S.C. 547(c)(2)). Others cover getting paid at the same time you delivered (11 U.S.C. 547(c)(1)) and shipping more goods after the payment (11 U.S.C. 547(c)(4)). Since 2019 the trustee also has to act "based on reasonable due diligence" and take account of defences they know or could reasonably know about (11 U.S.C. 547(b)).
There is a small-dollar floor, and for this case it is $8,575. In a case where the debts are not primarily consumer debts, a transfer whose aggregate value is below that cannot be avoided under this section (11 U.S.C. 547(c)(9)). The figure printed inside the statute is the un-adjusted $5,000; $8,575 is the amount in force for a case commenced on or after 1 April 2025 (90 Fed. Reg. 8941 (Feb. 4, 2025), effective April 1, 2025; adjustment authority 11 U.S.C. 104(a)). It applies to this case because 11 U.S.C. 104(c) ties the amount to the date the case was commenced rather than to today.
Demand letters on preference claims go out routinely and often get reduced or dropped. The useful response to one is your payment history and a bankruptcy lawyer. Nothing here is legal advice and none of it is a prediction about your situation.
There is no date we can compute, and we are not going to invent one. In chapter 11 the judge sets the bar date rather than a statute (Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3003(c)(3)), and the clerk must mail creditors at least 21 days notice of it (Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2002(a)). That notice is the only place the real date exists.
You may not have to file at all. If PSS Trucking, Inc. listed your claim on its schedules, in the right amount, and did not mark it disputed, contingent or unliquidated, that listing is prima facie evidence of your claim and a proof of claim is unnecessary. You must file if you are missing from the schedules, listed for the wrong amount, or flagged as disputed, contingent or unliquidated (Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3003(b)(1) and (c)(2)). Filing anyway is cheap insurance, because the alternative is trusting the company that owes you to have written your number down correctly.
None, and that is a gap in our collection rather than a fact about this case. This case comes from the historical court record, which gives us the debtor, the court, the case number, the chapter and the filing date. It does not carry the individual docket entries, and this case was filed before we began watching the live feeds, so we never saw them go by.
An active case generates entries constantly. Read the absence of a list here as our silence, not the court's.
We hold more case records than docket histories, and the difference matters. Case records — who filed, which court, which chapter, what date — come from the public historical court record and reach back years. Docket entries come from the courts' live filing feeds, which carry only about 24 hours at a time, and we began archiving those on 28 July 2026.
So a case may show a full record and no entries, or three entries when the real docket has three hundred. An empty or short list of entries is a gap in our collection, never a statement that nothing happened.
For the complete and authoritative docket, use PACER or the court directly.
Everything above comes from the public federal court record: the courts' own CM/ECF filing feeds, and the CourtListener RECAP archive maintained by the Free Law Project, which is where this case record came from. The authoritative source is the court: search case 26-40651 in the Northern District of California on PACER, which is the official system and charges per page.